Resumo O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi avaliar o efeito do ácido gástrico na rugosidade superficial e na formação do biofilme nas resinas compostas de incremento único. Vinte e sete amostras de cada resina composta foram confeccionadas: G1: Filtek Z250 XT (Z250), G2: Filtek Bulk Fill (FTK), G3: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TTC), and G4: Aura Bulk Fill (AUR). As amostras foram analisadas quantitativamente quanto à rugosidade da superfície (Ra) usando um rugosímetro (n=15) e para formação de biofilme (Cn) pela contagem de unidades formadoras de colônias (UFC/mL) (n=9) em três diferentes momentos: após polimento (Ra0 and Cn0), após imersão em ácido gástrico (Ra1 and Cn1), e após ácido gástrico e simulação de escovação (Ra2 and Cn2). Análise qualitative da topografia superficial (n=3) foi avaliada por meio de microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV). Os valores de Ra foram analisados pela ANOVA de duas vias para amostras pareadas, seguido do teste de Tukey. Os valores de Cn foram submetidos ao teste de Kruskal-Wallis, seguido da análise de comparações múltiplas (α=0,05). Z250 e FTK tiveram aumento significativo na rugosidade superficial em Ra1. Houve menos CFUs/mL para TTC e AUR em relação à Z250 e FTK em Cn0, Cn1 and Cn2. As imagens em MEV mostraram que o ácido gástrico aumentou a formação de fendas, exposição das partículas e mcrocavidades para todas as resinas compostas. Após escovação, as mudanças topográficas foram mais evidentes, mas não influenciou na formação do biofilme. O ácido gástrico promoveu degradação da superfície e adesão bacteriana para todas as resinas compostas.

Abstract The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of gastric acid on the surface roughness and biofilm formation of bulk-fill composite resins. Twenty-seven samples of each composite resin were obtained: G1: Filtek Z250 XT (Z250), G2: Filtek Bulk Fill (FTK), G3: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TTC), and G4: Aura Bulk Fill (AUR). The samples were quantitatively analyzed for surface roughness (Ra) using a roughness tester (n=15) and for biofilm formation (Cn) by the counting of colony-forming units (CFUs/mL) (n=9) in three different moments: after polishing (Ra0 and Cn0), after gastric acid immersion (Ra1 and Cn1), and after gastric acid and simulated tooth brushing (Ra2 and Cn2). Qualitative analysis through surface topography (n=3) was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Ra values were subjected to two-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. Cn values were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis analysis, followed by multiple comparisons analysis (α=0.05). Z250 and FTK showed significant increases in surface roughness at Ra1. There were fewer CFUs/mL on TTC and AUR in relation to those of Z250 and FTK for Cn0, Cn1 and Cn2. The SEM images showed that gastric acid increased the formation of cracks, exposure of fillers and micro cavities for all composite resins. After tooth brushing, the topographical changes were more evident but did not influence biofilm formation. The gastric acid promoted both degradation of the surfaces and bacterial adhesion for all composite resins.

Abstract: The present study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of novel computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restorative materials to dentin using different adhesive strategies. Thirty-two crowns were milled using CAD/CAM materials (Vita Mark II as control, Vita Suprinity, Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate) and luted to dentin using different resin cements (RelyX ARC, RelyX Unicem 2 and RelyX Ultimate). The specimens were stored in 100% relative humidity at 37°C for 24 h and sectioned. The samples (n = 16) with cross-sectional areas of approximately 0.90 mm2, were submitted to a μTBS test in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The samples were analyzed with SEM to determinate the failure mode. According to 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05), the interaction effect (material x luting strategy) was significant (p=0.001). Regardless of the luting strategy, a higher μTBS was obtained with Lava Ultimate and Vita Enamic, which were significantly different from Vita Mark II and Vita Suprinity (p<0.05). For Vita Mark II, Vita Suprinity, Vita Enamic, and Lava Ultimate, the μTBS obtained with RelyX Unicem 2 was not significantly different from that obtained with RelyX ARC or RelyX Ultimate. All groups obtained at least three types of failure. The adhesive strategy with self-adhesive resin cement was comparable to conventional resin cement with total-etch or self-etch adhesive techniques in the bond of novel CAD/CAM materials to dentin.